Exploring the Possibility that an Action can be Morally Right only if People Voluntarily Consent to it: Taking Euthanasia as an Example
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62381/ACS.HSMS2024.01
Author(s)
Leyan Li
Affiliation(s)
Shanghai Pinghe School, Shanghai, 201206, China
Abstract
The question that “When, if ever, can acts involving only consenting adults be morally wrong?” is controversial on the society. This essay will based on three variations to discuss on the question which are the definition of morality, situations under informed consent and situations under voluntary consent. This essay take euthanasia as an example to support the claim that acts can be only morally right when person consents to an act voluntarily.
Keywords
Philosophy; Consent; Euthanasia
References
[1]“The Definition of Morality”, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, substantive revision Tue Sep 8, 2020, p124, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/morality-definition/
[2]Zulfiqar A. Bhutta, “Beyond informed consent”, Bulletin of the World Health Organization (October 2004): p771, https://www.scielosp.org/pdf/bwho/2004.v82n10/771-777/en
[3]Zulfiqar A. Bhutta, “Beyond informed consent”, Bulletin of the World Health Organization (October 2004): p772, https://www.scielosp.org/pdf/bwho/2004.v82n10/771-777/en
[4]“Informed Consent: Informed Consent”, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, substantive revision Wed Jan 16, 2019, p72, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/informed-consent/#VolCon
[5]Zulfiqar A. Bhutta, “Beyond informed consent”, Bulletin of the World Health Organization (October 2004): p772 (figure.1), https://www.scielosp.org/pdf/bwho/2004.v82n10/771-777/en
[6]“Informed Consent: 2.2 Autonomy”, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, substantive revision Wed Jan 16, 2019, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/informed-consent/#VolCon
[7]Lokesh P. Nijhawan, Manthan D. Janodia, B. S. Muddukrishna, K. M. Bhat, K. L. Bairy, N. Udupa, and Prashant B. Musmade, “Informed consent: Issues and challenges (language barriers)”, J Adv Pharm Technol Res, Jul-Sep (2013) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3777303/
[8]“Informed Consent: 5.1 Coercion”, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, substantive revision Wed Jan 16, 2019, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/informed-consent/#VolCon
[9]“Informed Consent: 5.2 Undue Inducement”, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, substantive revision Wed Jan 16, 2019, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/informed-consent/#VolCon
[10]“Informed Consent: 5.3 ‘No choice situations’”, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, substantive revision Wed Jan 16, 2019, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/informed-consent/#VolCon
[11]James Rachels, “Active and Passive Euthanasia”, The new England Journal of Medicine (Jan, 1975) https://sites.ualberta.ca/~bleier/Rachels_Euthanasia.pdf
[12]“Voluntary Euthanasia: 3. A Moral Case for Voluntary Euthanasia”, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, substantive revision Tue May 24, 2022 https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/euthanasia-voluntary/#MoraCaseForVoluEuth