AEPH
Home > Conferences > Vol. 1. HSMS 2024 >
Legal Mechanism and Strategy Research for Infringement Disputes Based on Intellectual Property Rights
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62381/ACS.HSMS2024.36
Author(s)
Lin Zhang*
Affiliation(s)
College of Humanities and Social Sciences, North China Electric Power University, Beijing, China *Corresponding Author.
Abstract
The objective of this study is to identify effective dispute resolution mechanisms for intellectual property infringement disputes in order to address the challenges of the knowledge economy era. Through a comparative analysis of litigation and alternative dispute resolution methods, including mediation, arbitration, and conciliation by industry organizations, this paper provides an in-depth analysis of the characteristics and applicable conditions of each type of resolution mechanism. The study finds that different resolution mechanisms have their own advantages in intellectual property infringement disputes. It also reveals that optimizing and perfecting the dispute resolution mechanism is crucial for protecting the rights and interests of right holders, maintaining market order, and promoting innovation. Finally, this study reveals the practical application effects of different dispute resolution mechanisms through case analysis, which provides useful insights for the improvement of dispute resolution mechanisms in the future.
Keywords
Intellectual Property Infringement; Litigation Settlement; Alternative Dispute Resolution; Mediation; Arbitration
References
[1] Li Ziyi. Typological analysis of data rights disputes in judicial practice. Journal of Jiaozuo Normal College of Higher Education, 2024, 40 (01): 40-44+76. [2] Long Fei. Study on the Law on Promotion of Diversified Dispute Resolution Mechanisms. Renmin University of China Press: 202010. 318. [3] Qiu Guohan, Liu Yumeng, Subject Group of Hefei Wali Jueqi Robotics Technology Co. On the right boundary of patent infringement warning letter. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology (Social Science Edition), 2024, 37 (01): 59-64. [4] Shi Diya. Research on the mechanism of extra-litigation settlement of intellectual property disputes in China. Northwest University, 2020. DOI:10.27405/d.cnki.gxbdu.2020.000574. [5] Liang Qing, Shi Jianpan. Study on the standardization of labor dispute mediation and arbitration by means of information technology. Legal Expo, 2024, (09): 25-27. [6] Feng Jiyu. Rethinking the Effectiveness of Arbitral Awards. Zhenjiang Higher Education Journal, 2024, 37 (02): 63-67. [7] Huang Guoqun, Ma Shuwen. Improvement of Mediation in China's Intellectual Property Industry under the Perspective of Creative Autonomy. Social Sciences, 2022, 37 (02): 84-92. DOI:10.16745/j.cnki.cn62-1110/c.2022.02.017. [8] Wang H. Normative orientation and application improvement of alternative restoration. Journal of Heilongjiang Ecological Engineering Vocational College, 2024, 37 (02): 1-6+21. [9] Liu Hao. Protecting Trade Secrets and Fighting False Propaganda. China Consumer News, 2024-01-19(002). DOI:10.28867/n.cnki.nxfzb.2024.000126. [10] Xinlei Hu. Restatement of the historical origin and development of the relationship between social insurance and commercial insurance--an examination based on legal texts. Insurance Research, 2024, (02): 57-70. DOI:10.13497/j.cnki.is.2024.02.005.
Copyright @ 2020-2035 Academic Education Publishing House All Rights Reserved