AEPH
Home > Economic Society and Humanities > Vol. 1 No. 1 (ESH 2024) >
Main Character Analysis in “Great Expectations” Based on Cooperative Principle Theory
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62381/E244110
Author(s)
Meiwen Tan*, Xirui Liu, Jiahao Jiang
Affiliation(s)
Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou, Henan, China *Corresponding Author.
Abstract
“Great Expectations” is one of representative novels written by the British writer Charles Dickens. It shows the growth of the protagonist Pip. Compared with Dickens’s other works, predecessors have done less research on “Great Expectations” and mainly focused on the theme and personalities. However, few studies analyze the personalities of the main characters in “Great Expectations” from the perspective of pragmatics through conversations in the novel. This thesis attempts to use Cooperative Principle to explore the four main characters of Pip, Estella, Joe, and Havisham. The study finds that the use of the four maxims of Cooperative Principle can effectively grasp the pragmatic strategies of the main characters in Great Expectations, revealing the different personalities of the main characters in this novel, and help readers understand and appreciate “Great Expectations” better.
Keywords
Cooperative Principle; Great Expectations; Dialogue Analysis; Personalities
References
[1] Abbas Q. T. D. (2016). A Pragmatic Study of Exaggeration in British and American Novels. Journal of Education & Practice. 7(33):48-58. [2] Chen, X.,& Wei, Y. H. (2021). Object, Space and Identity: A Re-exploration of the Satis House in Great Expectations. Foreign language and Literature (02), 45-52. [3] Charles Dickens. (2000). Great expectations. Wordsworth Editions. [4] Du, P. J. (2017). A New Exploration of the Language Art in Great Expectations. Language Planning (20),28-29. [5] Flowler, R. (1996). Linguistic criticism. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. [6] Friedman, S. (2003). Dickens’ Fiction: Tapestries of Conscience. New York: AMS Press. [7] Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. [8] Gardner, R. (1995). Conversation analysis: some thought on its applicability to applied linguistics. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics Series. [9] Gazdar. (1979). Pragmatics: implicature, presupposition and logical form. New York: Academic Press. [10] Leech, G. N. (2016). Principles of pragmatics. Abingdon: Routledge. [11] Levinson, Stephen. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [12] Yang, L. L. (2015). An Analysis of the Symbolic Meaning in Great Expectations. Language Planning (29),98. [13] Jiang Wangqi. A Re-examination of Grice's Pragmatics -- Three problems in translation of Logic and Conversation. Contemporary Rhetoric, 2020(03):10. [14] Hou Yushan. Conversational Meaning analysis of the Best Day to Catch Bananafish under the Principle of Cooperation. Writer's Land, 2023. [15] Min Xiaomeng. The Educational Discipline and Narrative Process in Dickens' Novels. Journal of Capital Normal University (Social Sciences Edition, 2023.
Copyright @ 2020-2035 Academic Education Publishing House All Rights Reserved