Identification of Copyright Infringement of "Script Killing" Works
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62381/E244203
Author(s)
Ling Liu
Affiliation(s)
School of Law, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Abstract
With the continuous improvement of people's demand for recreational activities, the "script killing" industry has entered the fast track of development, which brings huge economic and cultural benefits, but also brings a series of legal problems. The frequent occurrence of various infringement cases urge the identification of the types of works protected by "script killing" in the Copyright Law, and explore the analysis of the main infringement acts, in order to achieve the purpose of safeguarding the legitimate rights and interests of non-traditional works such as "script killing".
Keywords
Script Killing; Copyright Law; Infringement Identification
References
[1]Pierre N. Leval. Toward a Fair Use Standard. Harvard Law Review, 1990, 10 3(5):1111.
[2]Zheng Chengsi. Copyright Law, China Renmin University Press, 1997.
[3]Katie Salen, Eric Zimmerman: Rules of Play: Game Design Fundamentals, The MIT Press, 2004.
[4]Julie E, Cohen,etc. Copyright in a Global Information Economy (3rd edition). AspenPublishers, 2010, 302.
[5]See Jonathan Mandell, Immersive Theater, Defined: Five Elements in Sleep No More, Then She Fell, and More, HowlRound, Feb.6, 2016, p4.
[6]Da Vinci Editrice S.R.L.v.Zi Ko Games, LLC, 183 F.Supp.3d 820,830,832,834 (2016);
[7]Ansgar Ohly, Unlauteres Verhalten als Voraussetzung für Wettbewerbsrechtlichen Nachahmungsschutz-Segmentstruktur, GRUR 79 (2017), S. 80-92.
[8]Xie Lin. The script to kill the store "rent" pirated script unfair competition identified. Intellectual Property Rights, 2022 (05): 47-60.
[9]Yang Ji. The ownership of the right to kill scripts and the nature of commercial pirated scripts. Publication Ref., 2022 (12): 10-15.
[10]Zhang Hongyu. The first case of pirated "script killing" of copyright infringement in Shanghai. Procuratorial situation, 2023 (20): 24-25.