AEPH
Home > Economic Society and Humanities > Vol. 1 No. 4 (ESH 2024) >
Digital Integration in Architecture of Space and Perception: A Book Review of Flesh: Architectural Probes
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62381/E244403
Author(s)
Tong Ke*, Liting Miao
Affiliation(s)
College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China *Corresponding Author.
Abstract
Diller and Scofidio's book "The Body: Exploring Architecture" explores the integration of digital transformation in architectural spaces. It explores how contemporary architecture manipulates spatial configurations and visual elements to challenge human perception and notions of space. The review involves how surveillance technologies and their impact on visibility and privacy within architectural designs, as well as the psychological effects of these spatial operations. The paper aims to elucidate the interplay between virtual space, architecture, and human sensorial experience.
Keywords
Body; Perception; Spatial Manipulation; Virtual Space
References
[1] Elizabeth Diller and Ricardo Scofidio, Flesh: Architectural Probes (New York: Princeton Architectural Press, 1994). [2] Georges Teyssot, A Topology of Everyday Constellations (Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2013), 226-7. [3] Stan Allen, Practice: Architecture, Technique and Representation (Amsterdam: G+B Arts International, 2000), 169. [4] Stephen Willats, “Transformers” (1989), in Antony Hudek, ed., The Object (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2014), 77. [5] Jean Baudrillard, The System of Objects, trans. James Benedict (New York & London: Verso, 2005), 46. [6] Olympia Kazi, “Architecture as a Dissident Practice: An Interview with Diller Scofidio+Renfro,” Architectural Design, Volume 79, Issue 1, 56-59. [7] Guido Incerti, Daria Ricchi, and Deane Simpson, Diller + Scofidio (Milan: Skira, 2007). [8] Jones, M., & Smith, L. (2023). Emerging Technologies in Urban Planning: Implications for the Built Environment. Urban Studies Review, 60(1), 25-40. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980221104567 [9] Sonia Solarova, Jan Podroužek, Milan Mesarčík, et al., “Reconsidering the Regulation of Facial Recognition in Public Spaces,” AI Ethics 3, 625–635 (2023), https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00194-0 [10] Shoshana Zuboff, The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power (Public Affairs, 2019). [11] Adam Gower, Matthias Hotker, Carl Grodach, “Digital City Modeling and Emerging Directions in Public Participation in Planning,” in Robert C. Brears, ed., The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Urban and Regional Futures (Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 2022), https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87745-3_292. [12] David Lyon, Surveillance Society: Monitoring Everyday Life (Open University Press, 2001). [13] Bernard Tschumi, Architecture and Disjunction (MIT Press, 1996). [14] Rob Kitchin, The Data Revolution: Big Data, Open Data, Data Infrastructures and Their Consequences (SAGE Publications, 2014). [15] Ann Cavoukian, “Privacy by Design: The 7 Foundational Principles,” Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario, Canada, 2009. [16] Cynthia Dwork, “Differential Privacy: A Survey of Results,” Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Models of Computation (2008). [17] Clare Garvie, The Perpetual Line-Up: Unregulated Police Face Recognition in America (Georgetown Law, Center on Privacy & Technology, 2016).
Copyright @ 2020-2035 Academic Education Publishing House All Rights Reserved