Research On the ‘Southbound Filmmakers’ with Their National Images: Diaspora, Anxiety and Spiritual Identification
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62381/E244407
Author(s)
Wei Lu*, Yezi Shu, Luqiang Wang
Affiliation(s)
School of Media and Arts, Chongqing University of Post and Telecommunications, Chongqing, China
*Corresponding Author.
Abstract
The ‘southbound filmmakers’ refers to a group of filmmakers who, during 1931--1966, went to the Southeast Asia from the cities like Shanghai, Guangzhou and Chongqing. They are one of the important parts of China’s filmmakers and their films is a significant attempt disseminating at abroad in the early days. To analyze the Southbound Filmmakers’ identity construction as well their activities such as living in the Southeast Asia, film-makings and dissemination, this paper adopts psychology, psychoanalysis, national identification, audience reception, etc., associated with theories like ‘culture, anxiety, identity and ideology’ under the overview of behavioral science. The ‘Southbound filmmakers’ is not only a group of filmmakers, but a historical concept and a special cinematic phenomenon. The diaspora complex and national identification were the important spiritual pillars for the filmmakers to carry on their film and social activities in the Southeast Asia. The Sounthbound films’ dissemination overseas is a helpful attempt for the Chinese films. Even though the filmmakers had different subjective activities and varied film contents, it objectively strengthened Chinese films’ connections with its foreign counterparts, promoted China’s films’ influences and increased Chinese culture’s dissemination in other countries, which is significant and has a long-time effect.
Keywords
Southbound Filmmakers; National Identification; Home Country Images; Spiritual Anxiety, Diaspora Complex
References
[1] Joseph Brenner and Wang Zhensong. Philosophy, Information, Intelligence, Society: A Complex Cognitive Ontolon. Journal of Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications (Social Science Edition), 2022, 34(04): 68-79.
[2] Su Tao. Drifting South: Shanghai Emigre Filmmakers and Postwar HK Cinema (1946-1966). Beijing: Peking University Press, 2020.
[3] Fu Baoshi. Downstream and Countercurrent: Rewriting the History of HK Film. Beijing: Peking University, 2020.
[4] Zhao Weifang and Zhang Wenyan. Politics, Art, or Commerce: The Interaction and Influence of Mainland and HK Films Since 1949 Beijing: China Film Press, 2018.
[5] Zhang Chenyu. A Study on the Communication of HK Films in East and Southeast Asia. Jinan: QiLu Press, 2017.
[6] Tan Hui. Chinese Film in Singapore. Beijing: Foreign Languages Press, 2020.
[7] Lu Yeqing. Chinese Film Spread Abroad in the Twentieth Century Twenties and Thirties. Beijing: Chinese National Academy of Arts, 2016.
[8] Xu Weixian. Chinese Language Movies in Post-Malaysia: Local Opera Style, Huayi Style, and Author Theory. LianJing Press, 2018.
[9] Jan Uhde and Yvonne Ng Uhde. Latent Images: Film in Singapore. London. Oxford University Press, 2000.
[10] Millet Raphael. Singapore Cinema. Editions Didier Millet, 2006.
[11] Chen Jiamei and Cheng Pengfei. "Patchwork" Memory: The Cinematic Body as Phenomenon. Journal of Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications (Social Science Edition), 2022, 34(03): 143-149.