Search

Thailand's 'Design Workshop' Model for Promoting Ethnic Integration: Research and Implications

Author(s)

Yan Wang1, Hongcai Chen2,*

Affiliation(s)

1Fujian Digital Media Economy Research Center, Fujian Social Science Research Base, Fujian, China 2Faculty of Decorative Arts, Silpakorn University, Bangkok, Thailand *Corresponding Author.

Abstract

This study focuses on the application and effects of Thailand's "design workshop" model in promoting ethnic integration. Through case studies of design workshops in Bangkok and Chiang Mai, we explore how this model facilitates cross-cultural understanding and cooperation through creative practices. The research finds that design workshops effectively reduce cultural barriers and enhance participants' cross-cultural competencies through co-creation, cultural dialogue, and emotional connections. Based on case analysis, this paper proposes a theoretical model of "design workshops promoting ethnic integration" and discusses its implications for China's ethnic measure. The study points out that this approach faces challenges in practice, such as ensuring equal participation and balancing cultural differences. Future research needs to further assess long-term effects and adapt to local contexts.

Keywords

Design Workshop; Ethnic Integration; Cross-cultural Understanding; Collaborative Innovation

References

[1] Li, M. (2018). Cultural diversity and social integration in the era of globalization. Chinese Social Sciences, (1), 94-110. [2] Vertovec, S. (2007). Super-diversity and its implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30(6), 1024-1054. [3] Modood, T. (2013). Multiculturalism. John Wiley & Sons. [4] Ma, R. (2004). New thoughts on understanding ethnic relations: "De-politicization" of ethnic minority issues. Journal of Peking University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), (6), 122-133. [5] Zhu, Z. (2016). Research on the spatial integration mechanism of urban ethnic communities. Ethnic Studies, (2), 52-62. [6] Wang, X. (2019). Urban practice of multicultural coexistence: A study of Guangzhou's "Qixinggang Model". Ethnic Studies, (3), 51-62. [7] Markusen, A., & Gadwa, A. (2010). Creative placemaking. National Endowment for the Arts. [8] Matarasso, F. (2019). A restless art: How participation won, and why it matters. Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation. [9] Kong, L. (2014). From cultural industries to creative industries and back? Towards clarifying theory and rethinking policy. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 15(4), 593-607. [10] Yue, A. (2015). Cultural governance and creative industries in Singapore. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 21(2), 215-231. [11] Zheng, X. (2020). Art intervention: A new approach to urban multicultural integration. Literature & Art Studies, (5), 30-39. [12] Manzini, E. (2015). Design, when everybody designs: An introduction to design for social innovation. MIT press. [13] Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley. [14] Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751. [15] Osborn, A. F. (1953). Applied imagination: Principles and procedures of creative problem-solving. Charles Scribner's Sons.