Search

Analysis of Cases and Characteristics of Arts Intervention in Rural Revitalization in the Greater Bay Area

Author(s)

Yingli Yang1, Zhuyan Cui2,*

Affiliation(s)

1School of Fine Arts and Design, GuangDong University of Finance & Economics, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China 2Guangzhou Academy of Fine Arts, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China *Corresponding Author.

Abstract

Art intervention in rural revitalization in the Greater Bay Area presents diversified modes, including art festivals/exhibitions, art education, art industrialization, public art intervention and art ecology co-construction. The typical cases of Qingtian Village in Shunde, Foshan, Leming Village in Conghua and Nanshe Village in Dongguan demonstrate the unique value of arts intervention. These cases reflect the common characteristics of art interventions in rural revitalization in the Greater Bay Area: respect for local culture, focus on villagers' participation and emphasis on sustainable development. Arts intervention has had a positive impact on rural cultural heritage and innovation, economic development, ecological environmental protection and governance capacity enhancement. In addition, this study also finds that the practice of arts intervention in the Greater Bay Area presents some unique characteristics, such as the combination of digital technology and traditional arts, the fusion of international perspectives and local practices, and the organic combination of arts intervention and industrial development. These features not only reflect the region's cultural heritage and economic strength, but also the innovative and systematic nature of arts intervention in rural revitalization.

Keywords

Art; Rural Construction; Rural Revitalization; Art Rural Construction

References

[1] Luo Xianmei. The Dilemma of Artistic and Touristic Rural Construction in Rural Governance - An Example of Three Ancient Villages in Guangdong, Hong Kong and Macao Greater Bay Area. Journal of Guangzhou University (Social Science Edition). 2023, 22 (06): 145-157. [2] Duxbury N, Campbell H. Developing and Revitalizing Rural Communities through Arts and Culture: Summary Overview. Small Cities Imprint, 2011, 3(March), pp.111-122. https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/65adc7cc-8786-3998-af34-369fccb0c891/ [3] Balfour B, Fortunato, M. W. P, Alter T. R. The creative fire: An interactional framework for rural arts-based development. Journal of Rural Studies, 2018, Volume 63pp. 229-239. DOI10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.11.002 [4] Qu Yan. Qingtian paradigm: the revival path of Chinese rural civilization. Interior Design and Decoration, 2017, 07, pp.126-127 [5] Liu Shuman. The "multiple subjectivity" of the art township construction under the rural revitalization strategy —— takes the "Qingtian paradigm" as an example. National Art, 2020, 06 pp. 135-143 [6] Zhang Ying. Twenty years of construction of Chinese art township: localization problem and Methodological dilemma. National Art, 2021, 05, pp. 15-25 [7] Chen Xiaoyang. "They" and "we": the social participatory practice of the source gallery. 2019-09-19. http://www.ruralwomengd.org/9772.html [8] Banyan Tree Head Village Residence Conservation Foundation. Qingtian —— Village site of the revival of Chinese civilization. 2019-1-18. http://www.ciudsrc.com/webdiceng.php?id=138074.html. [9] Liu Shuman. Theoretical Significance and Practical Path of the Participation of Art Heungjian in the Construction of ‘Harmonious Countryside for Livability and Business’. Art Studies, 2024(03): 135-142. [10] Huang Jin, Shi Mei, Mu Xingyu. The road of butterfly change in 800 years in Lingnan. Nanfang Daily, 2022-02-25 (A08) [11] Canal rock. Art horizon: Qu yans cultural standpoint and social expression. Nanjing: Southeast University Press, 2014 [12] Zhong Gang. Artistic intervention is a positive action for failure. Fine Art Observation, 2017, 12, pp.25-26. [13] Liu Qi. The zha: Mirror Structure and Cultural reconstruction. Film Arts, 2019, 05, pp. 46-49.