Competition and Cooperation between Digital RMB and Traditional Payment Methods
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62381/E244917
Author(s)
Jiaqi Chen*
Affiliation(s)
Shenzhen University, China
Corresponding Author
Abstract
In recent years, with the gradual expansion of the pilot scope of Digital Renminbi (DCEP), China's designated pilot regions for DCEP have encompassed 28 provinces. Concurrently, the scale of DCEP in daily consumption scenarios has steadily grown, with transaction volumes continuously increasing. DCEP confronts both opportunities and challenges in its competition and cooperation with traditional payment methods, such as paper currency, third-party payment platforms, and commercial banks. Through a comparative analysis of DCEP and traditional payment methods, this paper delves into the strengths and weaknesses of DCEP relative to its counterparts. Beyond mere comparison, it also examines the potential for collaboration between DCEP and traditional payment methods. Furthermore, a case study focusing on Suzhou, one of the pilot regions for DCEP, is conducted, analyzing the usage scenarios and payment modalities of DCEP. By integrating relevant data from other pilot regions, this paper identifies existing issues in the development of DCEP and offers suggestions for improvement.
Keywords
Digital RMB(DCEP); Third-Party Payment; Commercial Banks
References
[1] Zhou, X. C. (2020). Evolutionary Principles of Money and Payment in the Digital Age [R]. Speech delivered at the "Digital Financial Innovation and New Economic Development Patterns" Seminar hosted by the Institute of Digital Finance, Peking University.
[2] Wu, T. T., & Wang, J. P. (2020). China's Central Bank Digital Currency: Impacts, Issues, and Countermeasures. Financial Theory and Practice, (07), 25-37.
[3] Huang, G. P., Ding, Y., & Li, W. R. (2021). The Development Trend, Impact, and Policy Recommendations of Digital Renminbi. Research on Financial and Economic Issues, (6), 1-10.
[4] iPayLinks. (2023). What is the Role of Third-Party Payment Platforms? Usage Guide.Retrieved from https://www.ipaylinks.com/information_details.php?id=374
[5] Central Banks Digital Currency: Detection of Optimal Countries for the Implementation of a CBDC and the Implication for Payment Industry Open Innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1), 72. ISSN 2199-8531.
[6] Wang, S., & Lan, T. (2012). On the Development of Third-Party Payment and Its Impact on Commercial Banking Business. Financial Practice, (09), 70-74.
[7] Tang, K., & Chen, Y. J. (2020). The Issuance and Operation of Digital Renminbi: Opportunities and Challenges for Commercial Banks. SOUTHWEST FINANCE, (11), 24-33.
[8] Li, S., & Huang, Y. (2021). The Genesis, Design, and Implications of China’s Central Bank Digital Currency. China Economic Journal, 14(1), 67-77.
[9] iiMedia Research Center for Industrial Upgrading. (2022). iiMedia Report on the Development of China's Digital Currency in 2022. Retrieved from https://www.iimedia.cn/c400/83682.html
[10] The Paper·Politics. (2023). A National First with 50 Scenarios! Suzhou's Digital Renminbi Transactions Exceeded 340 Billion in 2022! Retrieved from https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_21773169
[11] Yu, K. (The Paper·Pujiang Headlines, 2024). Shanghai Municipal Development and Reform Commission: Nearly 70% Implementation Rate of 22 New Policies in "Greater Hongqiao". Retrieved from https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_26531472.