AEPH
Home > Higher Education and Practice > Vol. 1 No. 1 (HEP 2024) >
The Significance Construction of Higher Education Pedagogy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62381/H241109
Author(s)
Qinjin Huang
Affiliation(s)
Foshan University, Foshan, Guangdong, China
Abstract
The outcomes of higher education pedagogy encompass cognitive products, aesthetic products, and identity products. Traditional teaching models often lack an exploration of meaning and interactive relationships. Through a comparative analysis of teaching models and a methodological perspective, this study uncovers the objectives, foundations, and approaches to constructing pedagogical meaning, which are to foster the recognition of professional cognition and practitioner identity, strike a balance between value judgments and embodied practices, and forge connections between disciplinary symbols and real-life symbols. As witnesses of social environments, higher education institutions should place emphasis on the integration of online and offline teaching spaces in their practical endeavors to construct pedagogical meaning. Furthermore, the generation of faith in disciplinary methodologies within teaching content and the cultivation of dynamism in teaching approaches are crucial aspects to consider.
Keywords
Meaning; Construction; Pedagogy; Professional; Higher Education
References
[1]Weick, K. E. (1993). The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(4), 628-652. [2]Maitlis, S. (2005). The social processes of organizational sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 48(1), 21-49. [3] Zhong Qiquan. Classroom Transformation Pointers: R.K. Sawyer’s “Creative Classroom”. Global Education Outlook, 2023, 52(1): 3-16. [4] Huang Huo. Professional Ethics in Education. Taipei: Wunan Publishing Company, 2004: 127. [5]Jeffrey K. Olick. Genre Memories and Memory Genres: A Dialogical Analysis of May 8, 1945 Commemorations in the Federal Republic of Germany. American Sociological Review, 1999(3). [6] Huang Qinjin. Reflections on Moral Guidance in Professional Teaching of University Teachers. Education Exploration, 2010 (9): 49-50. [7] Manabu Sato. Classroom Confusions. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences Edition), 1998(2): 16-26. [8] Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1992). Practical Reason: On the Theory of Action[M]. translated by Li Meng and Li Kang. Beijing: Central Compilation and Translation Press, 1998: 263-278. [9] R.K. Sawyer. The Creative Classroom: A Teaching Paradigm for Deep Learning Based on “Improvisation” and “Framework”. translated by Maki Tsukitani. Tokyo: Eiji Publishing Company, 2021: 20, 122. [10] Wu Junqi, Wu Feiyan, Zhang Mengmeng. Construction and Application of Data-Driven Collaborative Learning Scaffold Models. Educational Research and Experiment, 2023(04): 128-136.
Copyright @ 2020-2035 Academic Education Publishing House All Rights Reserved