AEPH
Home > Higher Education and Practice > Vol. 1 No. 11 (HEP 2024) >
Research on the Relationship between College Students' Learning Motivation and the Effectiveness of Ideological and Moral Theory Courses
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62381/H241B15
Author(s)
Xianzhong Lin, Jing Wang*
Affiliation(s)
Scholl of Marxism, Shenzhen Polytechnic University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China * Corresponding author
Abstract
This paper explores the relationship between college students' learning motivation and the effectiveness of ideological and moral education courses. The research uses methods such as surveys, interviews, and classroom observations to analyze the different impacts of intrinsic and extrinsic motivations on learning outcomes. The results show that intrinsic motivation, such as interest and value identification, has a significantly greater impact on learning effectiveness compared to extrinsic motivations like the pursuit of grades and social pressure. Self-efficacy is also confirmed as an important influencing factor. The study suggests that enhancing learning outcomes can be achieved by stimulating intrinsic motivation, optimizing teaching methods, personalizing teaching strategies, and improving course evaluation systems.
Keywords
Learning Motivation; Learning Effectiveness; Ideological and Moral Education Courses; Intrinsic Motivation
References
[1] Du, J., & Jiang, Z. Y. (2023). Learning with No Gain or Learning with Achievement? A Study on Effective Cross-Boundary Learning Mechanisms from a Multi-Theory Perspective. Human Resource Management Review, (02): 1-20. [2] Huang, L. D. (2024). An Initial Exploration of the Causes of Interference in College Students' Classroom Learning and Coping Strategies. Educational Teaching Forum, (51): 77-80. [3] Li, H., Chu, Z. X., & Du, Z. F. (2024). Deconstruction and Reconstruction of College Students' Diversified Learning Motivation. Jiangsu Higher Education, (11): 80-88. DOI: 10.13236 /j. cnki. jshe. 2024.11.013. [4] Maslow, A. (1943). A Theory of Human Motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4): 370-396. [5] Bandura, A. (1977). Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review, 45(3), 123-135. [6] Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Cognitive Assimilation Learning Theory. Educational Psychology, 34(2), 102-115. [7] Lam, S., Jimerson, S., Wong, B. P. H., et al. (2014). Understanding and Measuring Student Engagement in School: Results of an International Study from 12 Countries. School Psychology Quarterly, 29(2), 213-232. [8] Zhu, Y. T. (2023). Implications of Ausubel's Meaningful Learning Theory for Junior High School Moral Education. Psychological Advances, 13(9), 3712-3718. [9] Li, X. Y., & Bai'er Na, A. L. I. P. U. (2024). College Students' Learning Motivation Strategies Based on Self-Value Theory. Teaching Research, 47(03): 15-21+40. [10] Li, W. Y., & Xu, W. Q. (2024). Characteristics of College Students' Course Gain from a Typological Perspective and Its Impact on Learning Engagement. China Higher Education Research, (02): 47-53. DOI: 10.16298/ j. cnki.1004-3667.2024.02.07.
Copyright @ 2020-2035 Academic Education Publishing House All Rights Reserved