AEPH
Home > Higher Education and Practice > Vol. 1 No. 4 (HEP 2024) >
Outcomes-based Teaching Reform of Introduction of Ships Based on Virtual Simulation Technology
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62381/H241415
Author(s)
Xuming Wang*, Fengbei Xia
Affiliation(s)
College of Marine Electrical Engineering, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian, China *Corresponding Author.
Abstract
The Introduction of Ships course is characterized by strong professionalism, perspective, and practicality, which is one of the core courses in the field of ship engineering. To solve the problem of poor teaching effect caused by the large amount of information and dispersion of the course, this paper proposes a reform plan for the education mode of Introduction of Ships based on the Outcomes-Based Education (OBE) concept and virtual simulation technology. Relying on the online virtual experiment platform, the course teaching resources are expanded and an integrated teaching model is constructed including pre-course, in-course, and post-course. The novel education mode is problem-oriented, closely integrates practical content with theoretical knowledge, and a customized teaching mode is realized through project-driven, case study, and comprehensive assessment and evaluation. A hybrid online and offline teaching channel is formed by synthesizing a variety of teaching strategies, so as to expand the flexibility of teaching activities. The proposed education mode can stimulate enthusiasm of students for active participation and independent learning, effectively achieve the student-centered teaching goal. Meanwhile, it has good expandability and can provide guidance and reference for the teaching of similar professional courses.
Keywords
Introduction of Ships; Education Mode Reform; Virtual Simulation Technology; OBE
References
[1] X. Cheng, “Research on teaching reform of ship construction based on post task,” Shipbuilding Vocational Education, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 39-40+47, 2019. (in Chinese) [2] L. Ren and W. Zhang, “Teaching reform of the course of marine engineering and ship equipment,” The Guide of Science & Education, no. 23, pp. 96-87, 2016. (in Chinese) [3] M. Yasmin and A. Yasmeen, “Viability of outcome-based education in teaching English as second language to chemical engineering learners,” Education for Chemical Engineers, vol. 36, pp. 100-106, 2021. [4] Q. Wu, H. Li, Y. Shen, “Research on teaching reform of higher engineering specialty based on OBE perspective,” Education Exploration, vol. 5, pp. 97-100, 2016. [5] A. J. Magana, C. Vieira, and M. Boutin, “Characterizing engineering learners’ preferences for active and passive learning methods,” IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 61, no.1, pp. 46-54, 2018. [6] P. Zheng, J. Yang, J. Lou, and B. Wang, “Design and application of virtual simulation teaching platform for intelligent manufacturing,” Scientific Reports, vol. 14, no.1, pp. 12895, 2024. [7] A. K. Saha, “A real-time simulation-based practical on overcurrent protection for undergraduate electrical engineering students,” IEEE access, vol. 10, pp. 52537-52550, 2022. [8] J. Wang, S. Chen, L. Wang, and X. Yang, “The analysis of research hot spot and trend on big data in education based on cite space,” Modern Educational Technology, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 5-13, 2016. [9] N. Li, M. Gao, S. Liu, Y. Han, and Y. Xi, “Research and innovation of engineering simulation practice teaching platform based on the civil engineering talent training,” Computer Applications in Engineering Education, vol. 32, no.3, pp. e22713, 2024. [10] Y. Mao, B. Li, Z. Han, and Q. Liu, “Research on the credit application and shared innovation of cross-school credit of art design history in Liaoning province based on the perspective of MOOCS,” Curriculum and Teaching Methodology, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 126-137, 2024.
Copyright @ 2020-2035 Academic Education Publishing House All Rights Reserved