Search

A Study on the Implementation Effects of Flipped Classrooms Versus Traditional Classrooms

Author(s)

Lin Ding*

Affiliation(s)

School of Teacher Education, Hubei University of Education, Wuhan, Hubei, China *Corresponding Author.

Abstract

This paper compares the implementation effects of the flipped classroom and traditional classroom models, focusing on the advantages and challenges of each method. The flipped classroom shifts knowledge acquisition outside the classroom and emphasizes application within the classroom. Studies have found that flipped classrooms can significantly improve students’ learning efficiency, critical thinking, and independent learning abilities. Research shows that flipped classrooms can improve overall teaching quality and learning outcomes by promoting student autonomy and interactivity. However, the success of flipped classrooms depends on addressing challenges such as the need for students to develop stronger self-learning abilities and the increased demand for educational resources and technical support. Research points out that careful planning, instructional design, and continuous feedback are essential to ensure effective implementation. Although the flipped classroom model has significant teaching advantages, its successful adoption requires attention to resource allocation, student readiness, and teacher guidance skills.

Keywords

Flipped Classroom; Traditional Classroom; Implementation Effects

References

[1] Guo Hua. Five Characteristics of Deep Learning. People’s Education, 2019, (6): 76-80. [2] Tang Wenhua. Exploration of the Flipped Classroom Teaching Mode for “Deep Learning” in Universities. Education and Teaching Forum, 2021, (24): 169-172. [3] Yu Yang, Liang Huaqiang. Construction and Application Research of Flipped Classroom Teaching Mode Based on Mobile Learning Platform. Education Modernization, 2018, (44): 191-194. [4] Li Zhihe, Liu Dan, Li Ning, et al. Research on the Influencing Factors of Deep Learning in Flipped Classroom Mode. Modern Educational Technology, 2018, (12): 55-61. [5] Wang Xiaochen, Zhang Jiaqi, Yang Hao, et al. Research on the Flipped Classroom Teaching Mode in Universities from the Perspective of Deep Learning. E-Education Research, 2020, 41(12): 85-91+128. [6] Qiu Xiaochun, Xiao Longhai. Research on the Development and Validation Methods of Flipped Classroom Teaching Mode: Taking English Cultural Courses as an Example. Foreign Language and Literature, 2020, (6): 147-156. [7] Lee, M. J. W., Tsai, C. C. Exploring Teachers’ Perceived Self-Efficacy and Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge with Respect to the Flipped Classroom Implementation. Computers & Education, 2018, 127: 1-14. [8] Amir, S., & Salman, A. A Review of the Flipped Classroom in K-12 Education. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 2018, 46(3): 291-306. [9] Chen, P. S. D., Kuo, Y. T. Transformation Leadership and Teacher Acceptance of Flipped Classroom Instruction. Computers & Education, 2017, 108: 17-30. [10] Bergmann, J., Sams, A. Flip Your Classroom: Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day. Updated and Expanded Edition. International Society for Technology in Education, 2017. [11] Talbert, R. Inverting the Linear Algebra Classroom. PRIMUS: Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies, 2014, 24(5): 361-374. [12] Strayer, J. F. How Learning in an Inverted Classroom Influences Cooperation, Innovation, and Task Orientation. Learning Environments Research, 2012, 15(2): 171-193. [13] O’Flaherty, J., Phillips, C. The Impact of Flipped Classrooms in Medical Education: A Systematic Review. Medical Education, 2015, 49(1): 96-106.