Search

Optimization of Problem Chain Teaching Design for Ideological and Political Theory Courses in Colleges and Universities Based on Advanced Thinking

Author(s)

Zhouyan Xie

Affiliation(s)

School of Marxism, Hunan University of Science and Engineering, Yongzhou, Hunan, China

Abstract

The problem chain teaching mode of values education based on advanced thinking means that in the values education in colleges and universities, teachers design the teaching content into a sequence of problems from easy to difficult, with detailed and weak points, primary and secondary ones, under the guidance of problem logic according to students' cognitive development level and the logical structure of disciplinary knowledge. Each problem increases the difficulty and depth on the basis of the previous one, promoting the advanced thinking of students and realizing high-quality classroom teaching. The problem chain teaching of values education based on thinking progression takes the problem logic as the guidance according to the students' thinking level hierarchy, and realizes the development goal in the continuous questioning. It is the inherent requirement to promote the innovation of problem-based teaching in values education, and also the core strategy to cultivate college students' high-level thinking ability. To realize the advanced thinking in values education teaching, three points should be paid attention to: first, the spiral rise points to the core teaching goal; second, the step-by-step progress pays attention to giving play to the students' subjectivity; third, the continuous development pays attention to the application of knowledge production.

Keywords

Advanced Thinking; Principle; Problem Chain; Teaching Design

References

[1] Yang Bojun (translator and annotator). Annotations and Translations of The Analects of Confucius. Zhonghua Book Company, 2017: 129. [2] Aristotle. Nicomachean Ethics. Translated by Liao Shenbai. Beijing: The Commercial Press, 2017: 187. [3] Zhi Tingjin. Teaching for Thinking. Beijing: Educational Science Publishing House, 2022: 23. [4] (US) John Dewey. How We Think. Translated by Ma Minghui. Shanghai: East China Normal University Press, 2020: 210. [5] Liu Bingyuan, Wen Yonghui. From Propositions to Questions: Building a “Scaffold” for Advanced Thinking. Research in Teaching and Learning, 2021(8): 38-41. [6] Xia Xuemei. Discourse Reform for High-Order Thinking and Social Development in Traditional Classrooms. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences Edition), 2019(5): 105. [7] Ji Mingfeng, Zhou Wanchun. Teaching Reform Aiming at Cultivating High-Order Thinking. Teaching Guide, 2024(9): 31. [8] Deng Zhiguo, Dong Youjun. Design of Problem Situations Based on the Progression of Scientific Thinking Levels. Physics Teacher, 2023, 44(7): 30. [9] Li Jingjing, Li Hongliang. Triple Inquiries on a Market Economic System. Economic Issues, 2024, 45(1): 25. [10] Hu Xiaoyong. Where Is the Cultivation of Learners’ High-Order Thinking Heading with the Empowerment of Artificial Intelligence? . E-Education Research, 2022 (12): 87.