AEPH
Home > Occupation and Professional Education > Vol. 1 No. 1 (OPE 2024) >
The Influence of Occupational Stigma on Kindergarten Teachers' Turnover Intention: A Family Perspective
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62381/O242107
Author(s)
Hui Sun1,*, Tian Zhang2
Affiliation(s)
1School of Preschool Education, Jiangsu Second Normal University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China 2Department of Sociology, Nanjing University of Science & Technology, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China *Corresponding Author.
Abstract
Based on the identity boundary theory and from the perspective of family, this study explores the impact of occupational stigma on kindergarten teachers' turnover intention. The study investigated 495 kindergarten teachers from eight provinces and cities through occupational stigma perception questionnaire, turnover intention questionnaire, stigma questionnaire involving family members and family involvement questionnaire. The results show that the perception of occupational stigma can not only directly predict the turnover intention of kindergarten teachers, but also mediate the influence of family stigma. In addition, the three paths of the mediation are all moderated by family involvement variables: when the family involvement is high, occupational stigma can significantly and positively predict kindergarten teachers' involvement in family stigma and turnover intention, and involvement in family stigma can also positively predict turnover intention. On the contrary, when the degree of family involvement is low, occupational stigma has no significant predictive effect on kindergarten teachers’ family stigma and turnover intention, and family stigma has no significant predictive effect on turnover intention. In order to avoid the impact of professional stigma on kindergarten teachers' turnover tendency, it is necessary to eliminate stigma from the three levels of society, kindergarten teachers and kindergarten teachers' families, and resolve the kindergarten teachers' turnover crisis.
Keywords
Kindergarten Teachers; Occupational Stigma; Turnover Intention; Family Perspective
References
[1] Xu X C, and Wang F. Analysis of stigmatization phenomenon of kindergarten teachers. Education Review, 2019, (1): 112-116. [2] Gonzalez J A, Perez-Floriano L R. If you can't take the heat: Cultural beliefs about questionable conduct, stigma, punishment, and withdrawal among Mexican police officers. Organization Studies, 2015, 36(5): 665-687. [3] Ling X J, Shi S, and Guo L P. Study on the retention intention and influencing factors of private kindergarten teachers: taking E City in Guangdong Province as an example. Early Education, 2021, (43): 18-22. [4] O’Leary M, Mortensen M, and Woolley A W. Multiple team membership: A theoretical model of its effects on productivity and learning for individuals and teams. Academy of Management Review, 2011, 36(3): 461-478. [5] Ashforth B E, and Kreiner G E. Dirty work and dirtier work: Differences in countering physical, social, and moral stigma. Management and Organization Review, 2014, 10(1): 81-108. [6] Ji H, Yan J, and Guo W X. How and when does occupational stigma promote intent to leave? The mediation effect of family implicated stigma and the moderating effect of family involvement. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2022, 54(2): 182-191. [7] Lewis J. Learning to strip: The socialization experiences of exotic dancers. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 1998, 7(1): 51–66. [8] Frine M R, Russell M, and Cooper M L. Antecedents and outcomes of work-family conflict: Testing a model of the work-family interface. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1992, 77(1): 65-78. [9] Michel J S, Kotrba L M, Mitchelson J K, et al. Antecedents of work-family conflict: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2011, 32(5): 689-725. [10] Aryee S, Srinivas E S, and Tan H H. Rhythms of life: Antecedents and outcomes of work-family balance in employed parents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2005, 90(1): 132–146. [11] Pinel E C, and Paulin N. Stigma consciousness at work. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 2005, 27(4): 345-352. [12] Grandey A A, Tam A P, and Btauburger A L. Affective states and traits in the workplace: Diary and survey data from young workers. Motivation and Emotion, 2002, 26(1): 31-55. [13] Paustian-Underdahl S C, Halbesleben J R B, Carlson D S, et al. The work-family interface and promotability: Boundary integration as a double-edged sword. Journal of Management, 2016, 42(4): 960–981. [14] Lopina E C, Rogelberg S G, and Howell B. Turnover in dirty work occupations: A focus on pre-entry individual characteristics. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 2012, 85(2): 396–406. [15] Zhang Y and Li G Q. "Dirty" work: concept, measurement and its impact on practitioners. Foreign Economic and Management, 2017, 39(10): 86-101. [16] Zhou Y and Huang X. Perceived occupational stigma, employee well-being, and high-status occupations: A cognitive dissonance perspective. Economic Management, 2018, 40(4): 84-101. [17] Simpson R, Hughes J and Slutskaya N. Gender, class and occupation: Working class men doing dirty work. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2017. [18] Qi X. Review of traditional Chinese family culture and its generalization in organizations. Journal of China University of Labor Relations, 2016, 30(6):104-108. [19] Shulman S, Barr T, Livneh Y, et al. Career pursuit pathways among emerging adult men and women: Psychosocial correlates and precursors. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 2015, 39(1): 9-19. [20] Fang M, Sun Y and Fu C. The departure configuration of non-established kindergarten teachers: based on a qualitative comparative analysis of fuzzy sets. Preschool Education Research, 2021, (7): 64-82. [21] Liu Y and Song L Q. The impact of salary fairness perception on the retention intention of inclusive kindergarten teachers: the mediating role of salary satisfaction and the moderating role of opportunity fairness perception. Psychological Research, 2022, 15(1): 61-69. [22] Sun H and Zhang T. The impact of news reports and online comments about family conflicts on parents' trust in kindergartens. Preschool Education Research, 2020, (9): 3-12.
Copyright @ 2020-2035 Academic Education Publishing House All Rights Reserved