Search

A Study on the Influence of Value-added Evaluation of Vocational Education Students on Teaching Quality

Author(s)

Fang Qin

Affiliation(s)

Xi’an Peihua University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China

Abstract

This paper aims to delve into the influence of value-added evaluation of vocational education students on teaching quality, with a focus on the importance of vocational education in nurturing skilled professionals. It systematically explores the design of indicators for value-added evaluation of students in vocational education. The emphasis is that how the results of student value-added evaluation can drive improvements in teaching quality. Three key recommendations are provided, including continuous improvement of teaching methods, personalized instruction and student support, and the establishment of a positive teaching culture and learning community. These recommendations aim to help schools and educators better understand student needs, optimize teaching strategies, and enhance overall teaching quality. In summary, this paper provides practical guidance and strategic recommendations for enhancing teaching quality through in-depth research on the theory and practice of value-added evaluation of students in vocational education.

Keywords

Vocational Education; Value-Added Evaluation; Teaching Quality; Influence Study

References

[1] Ma Li, Zheng Yuhua. Research on Value-added Evaluation of Vocational Education Technical and Skill Talents Training. Education and Vocation, 2022(11): 13-20. [2] Zhang Zhuyu. How to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Teaching in Vocational Schools: Strategies Based on the Value-added Model of Student Knowledge Graph. Chinese Vocational and Technical Education, 2022(17): 49-54. [3] Zhuang Xizhen. On the Significance of Value-added Evaluation for the High-quality Development of Vocational Education. Chinese Vocational and Technical Education, 2021(04): 12-17. [4] Chen Yuanyuan, Lyu Luping. Value Added Evaluation of Vocational Education: Evolution, Logic and Paths. Vocational and Technical Education, 2022, 43(16): 47-52. [5] Kirkpatrick, Donald L. How to Do Training Evaluation: Kirkpatrick’s Four Levels. Translated by Xi Weihua, Lin Zhujun, et al. Beijing: Electronic Industry Press, 2015(3): 25-27. [6] Ren Congmin. Theoretical Construction and Path Exploration of Value-added Evaluation in Vocational Education. Vocational & Technical Education Forum, 2021, 37(07): 40-44. [7] Wang Xichuan, Zhao Jing, Wang Yao, et al. Value-added Evaluation of Public Courses in Vocational Education: Value Rationality and Practical Logic. Chinese Vocational and Technical Education, 2022(32): 18-23+30. [8] Pan Jiening. Exploration and Practice of Value-added Evaluation of Higher Vocational Students——An Empirical Analysis Based on the Evaluation of Students'Problem-solving Ability in 6 Higher Vocational Colleges. Vocational and Technical Education, 2022, 43(20): 54-61. [9] Zeng Shanpeng, Su Sheng, Zeng Pingfei. Research on Predicting and Differentiating Cultural Discipline Scores Based on Value-added Evaluation. Chinese Vocational and Technical Education, 2022(34): 85-91. [10] Wang Yan. Design and Implementation of the Evaluation System for Project-based Curriculum Grades in Higher Vocational Education Based on the Value-added Concept. Chinese Vocational and Technical Education, 2016(08): 71-75. [11] Zhou Wenqing. The Value-added Assessment: an New Choice of the Quality Evaluation of the Practice Teaching for Higher Vocational Colleges. Journal of Educational Science of Hunan Normal University, 2016, 15(03): 126-128.