AEPH
Home > Occupation and Professional Education > Vol. 1 No. 7 (OPE 2024) >
Generative AI in Vocational English Teaching: Teacher Perspectives, Strategies, and Challenges
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62381/O242712
Author(s)
Xiaojing Huang*, Anqi Dou, Yanyan Wu
Affiliation(s)
Hainan Vocational University of Science and Technology, Haikou, Hainan, China *Corresponding Author
Abstract
This study examines the integration of generative AI in vocational college English teaching, focusing on teachers' strategies and challenges. Using a qualitative approach with semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions, this research explores the impact of AI tools on curriculum design, lesson delivery, and assessment. The findings reveal that while AI enhances language instruction through automation and engagement, teachers face challenges such as technical limitations, lack of support, and difficulties in personalization. These insights provide valuable guidance for educators seeking to improve AI integration in vocational language education.
Keywords
Generative AI; College English; Teacher Strategies; AI-assisted English Instruction; Pedagogical Challenges
References
[1]Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. Ieee Access, 8, 75264-75278. [2]Alam, A., & Mohanty, A. (2023). Educational technology: Exploring the convergence of technology and pedagogy through mobility, interactivity, AI, and learning tools. Cogent Engineering, 10(2), 2283282. [3]Divekar, R. R., Drozdal, J., Chabot, S., Zhou, Y., Su, H., Chen, Y., ... & Braasch, J. (2022). Foreign language acquisition via artificial intelligence and extended reality: design and evaluation. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(9), 2332-2360. [4]Mayer, S., & Schwemmle, M. (2023). Teaching university students through technology-mediated experiential learning: Educators' perspectives and roles. Computers & Education, 207, 104923. [5]Wei, L. (2023). Artificial intelligence in language instruction: impact on English learning achievement, L2 motivation, and self-regulated learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1261955. [6]Chen, Y. L., Hsu, C. C., Lin, C. Y., & Hsu, H. H. (2022). Robot-assisted language learning: Integrating artificial intelligence and virtual reality into English tour guide practice. Education Sciences, 12(7), 437. [7]Murtaza, M., Ahmed, Y., Shamsi, J. A., Sherwani, F., & Usman, M. (2022). AI-based personalized e-learning systems: Issues, challenges, and solutions. IEEE access, 10, 81323-81342. [8]Friginal, E. (2024). Beyond expectations: (Applied) corpus linguistics and a framework for the study of spoken professional talk. ibérica, (47), 43-66. [9]Kim, J. (2024). Leading teachers’ perspective on teacher-AI collaboration in education. Education and Information Technologies, 29(7), 8693-8724. [10]Zhang, C., Schießl, J, Plößl, L., Hofmann, F., & Gläser-Zikuda, M. (2023). Acceptance of artificial intelligence among pre-service teachers: a multigroup analysis. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 49. [11]Farrelly, T., & Baker, N. (2023). Generative artificial intelligence: Implications and considerations for higher education practice. Education Sciences, 13(11), 1109.
Copyright @ 2020-2035 Academic Education Publishing House All Rights Reserved