The Application of Rich Feature Analysis in Composition Studies
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62381/O242907
Author(s)
Junling Liu*
Affiliation(s)
Department of Foreign Language, Sichuan University of Media and Communications, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
*Corresponding Author
Abstract
This paper employs rich feature analysis, particularly focusing on Halliday’s transitivity, to explore linguistic features in argumentative essays about whether celebrities are suitable role models for young people. The study investigates the connection between linguistic structures and meanings in varied contexts, aiming to enhance learners’ academic writing competence. The analysis reveals the prevalence of relational and material processes, influenced by the formal context and genre requirements. Comparative examination of two texts highlights differences in structure, process types, and participant selection, indicating potential cultural influences. However, the study acknowledges a limitation for students with lower language proficiency and raises some suggestions for future research.
Keywords
Rich Feature Analysis; Relational Process; Material Process; Linguistic Features; Genre; Academic Writing
References
[1] Barton, E. Linguistic discourse analysis: How the language in texts works. In C. Bazerman, & P. Prior (Eds.), What writing does and how it does it; Publisher: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 2004; pp.57-82.
[2] Halliday, M. A. K. An introduction to functional grammar, 2nd ed.; Publisher: Edward Arnold, London, 1994.
[3] Coffin, C., Donohue, J., & North, S. Exploring English grammar: From formal to functional; Publisher: Routledge, London, 2009; pp.249-292.
[4] Moore, T. The ‘processes’ of learning: On the use of Halliday’s transitivity in academic skills advising. In C. Coffin, T. Lillis, & K. O'Halloran (Eds.), Applied linguistics methods: A reader; Publisher: Routledge, London, 2010; pp. 52-71.
[5] Martin, J. R. Language, register and genre. In A. Burns, & C. Coffin (Eds.), Analysing English in a global context: A reader; Publisher: Routledge, London, 2001; pp. 149-166.
