AEPH
Home > Philosophy and Social Science > Vol. 1 No. 4 (PSS 2024) >
Research on the Dilemma between Individual Rationalization and Community Orderliness: Take the COVID-19 as an Example
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62381/P243401
Author(s)
Lihua Liao
Affiliation(s)
School of Marxism, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China
Abstract
The COVID-19, which broke out in Wuhan at the beginning of 2020 and then hit the whole country, fully exposed the dilemma between the rational action of individuals and the order required by the community. However, behind this practical dilemma, there is actually a deeper theoretical problem, that is, whether people are atomic individuals or members of the community. This dilemma limits the possible strategies for overcoming it. Specifically, for the rationalization of human beings and the orderliness of the community, the possible strategies can not be achieved by negating one of the two, but can only be regulatory. The academic review of the concept of community indicates that this regulation is both possible and realistic: on the one hand, the construction of the community needs to be strengthened, making it a "big family" that is subjectively recognized by its members, and on the other hand, the community consciousness of its members needs to be cultivated. This cultivation requires both educational intervention and the establishment of a platform for the community to build its members’ sense of ownership through the construction of the entity level.
Keywords
COVID-19, Rationalization; Community; Order
References
[1] Aristotle. Politics, translated by Ernest Barker, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995. [2] Gong Qun. Returning to Communitarianism and Saving Virtue: A Review of Modern Virtue Ethics, Philosophical Dynamics, 1998, Issue 6. [3] Erxiang. Our divided circle of friends under the epidemic, the article is from the “Six dimensional space of Erxiang” on WeChat official account (February 9, 2020). [4] Fang Fang. Collective silence, this is the most terrifying, Fang Fang Wuhan Diary, February 7th (February 29th). [5] Christensen, K. & D. Levinson (eds.). Encyclopedia of Community: From the Village to the Virtual World, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2003. [6] Max Weber. Protestant Ethics and the Spirit of Capitalism, translated by Yu Xiao, Chen Weigang, et al., Beijing: Sanlian Bookstore of Life, Reading, and New Knowledge, 1992. [7] Zheng Feng. Historical Reflection on Human Rationalization in the Process of Modernization, Theory and Reform, Vol. 6, 2007. [8] Li Rongshan. The Destiny of Communities: From Herder to Contemporary Changes, Sociological Research, 2015, Issue 1. [9] Tönnies F. Community and Civil Society, edited by Jose Harris, translated by Jose Harris & Margaret Hollis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. [10] MacIntyre A. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory (Third Edition), Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2007, p220. [11] Ulrich Beck, Elizabeth Beck Ginsheim. Individualization, translated by Li Rongshan, Fan Yi, and Zhang Huiqiang, Beijing: Peking University Press, 2011, p85. [12] Long Jinju. Construction of the Chinese National Community under the Semantic Concept of “Community”, Guangxi Ethnic Studies, Issue 2, 2019, p13. [13] I.F. Stone. The Trial of Socrates, translated by Dong Leshan, Beijing: Peking University Press, 2015, p26.
Copyright @ 2020-2035 Academic Education Publishing House All Rights Reserved