The Perceptions of Speech-language Pathologists toward Augmentative and Alternative Communication in China
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62381/P243408
Author(s)
Yanan Li*, Qingqing Xie, Lifang Zhang
Affiliation(s)
Department of Rehabilitation Engineering, Beijing College of Social Administration (formerly the Ministry of Civil Affairs Management Cadre Institute), Beijing, China
*Corresponding Author.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to investigate the awareness and use of Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) systems, as well as the related training received by speech therapists in China. A questionnaire survey was designed and distribute to speech therapists in hospitals, rehabilitation organizations and universities in China. A total of 50 valid questionnaires were returned. The results showed that 94% of the speech therapists had heard of various AAC tools. However, only 10% of the speech therapists considered themselves proficient in providing AAC assessment and intervention services. 30% of them had never received AAC training, 48% had attended seminars or lectures related to AAC but had not received systematic training, and 20% had only received less than 1 day of training. 80% of the speech therapists expressed a strong interest in participating in AAC training, and most of the speech therapists believed that the AAC tools helped improve their patients’ communication skills. This research provided insights into how Chinese speech therapists perceived AAC devices. However, the research also revealed a lack of training and experience with AAC in China.
Keywords
Augmentative and Alternative Communication; Communication Disorders; Speech and Language Therapists; AAC Education
References
[1] Beukelman, D. R., & Light, J. C. (2020). Augmentative & Alternative communication: Supporting Children and Adults with Complex Communication Needs. Brookes Publishing Company.
[2] Wangfei. (2015). Research on the teachers’ and parents’ perspective and application of Augmentative and Alternative Communication. [Thesis]. East China Normal University.
[3] Drager, K., Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2010). Effects of AAC interventions on communication and language for young children with complex communication needs. Journal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine, 3(4), 303-310. https://doi.org/10.3233/PRM-2010-0141.
[4] Romski, M., Sevcik, R. A., Barton-Hulsey, A., & Whitmore, A. S. (2015). Early intervention and AAC: What a difference 30 years makes. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31(3), 181-202. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2015.1064163.
[5] Lloyd, L. L., Fuller, D. R., & Arvidson, H. H. (1997). Augmentative and alternative communication: A handbook of principles and practices. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon
[6] Ma Rong-rong. (2013). Application of Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) Systems in the Study of Communication Disorders in Children with Autism. [Doctoral dissertation]. Zhejiang University of Technology.
[7] McNaughton, D., Rackensperger, T., Benedek-Wood, E., Krezman, C., Williams, M. B., & Light, J. (2008). “A child needs to be given a chance to succeed”: Parents of individuals who use AAC describe the benefits and challenges of learning AAC technologies. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24(1), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610701421007
[8] Ganz, J. B., Pustejovsky, J. E., Reichle, J., Vannest, K. J., Foster, M., Pierson, L. M., & Smith, S. D. (2023). Participant characteristics predicting communication outcomes in AAC implementation for individuals with ASD and IDD: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 39(1), 7-22.
[9] Ibrahim, S., Clarke, M., Vasalou, A., & Bezemer, J. (2024). Common ground in AAC: how children who use AAC and teaching staff shape interaction in the multimodal classroom. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 40(2), 74-85.
[10] Laubscher, E., Pope, L., & Light, J. (2024). “You just want to be able to communicate with your child”: Parents’ Perspectives on Communication and AAC use for beginning communicators on the autism spectrum. American Journal of Speech-language Pathology, 33(2), 716–735. https://doi.org/10.1044/2023_ajslp-23-00254
[11] Liu Ya-nan, Liu Jian-jun. Application of Augmentative and Alternative Communication in Communication Training of Children with Autism (review). Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice, 2017, 23(4): 410-414.
[12] Zhang, X. (2012). Intervention and methodological elements of augmentative communication systems for children with autism. Chongqing Normal University. (Doctoral dissertation, Chongqing Normal University).
[13] Liu, M., & Feng, W. (2013). A review of the research on the Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) in autism intervention. Journal of Suihua University, 33(10), 93-98.
[14] Qi, H. (2018). The impact of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) system training on the communicative abilities of nonverbal intellectually disabled children. [Thesis]. Southwest University.
[15] Qian, Y. (2018). “Promoting the Development of Language and Communication Skills in Children with Autism through the Application of Augmentative and Alternative Communication Systems.” Gejie, 8, 138-138.