Algorithmic Discrimination and Market Competition: Exploring the Ethical and Legal Issues of Algorithm Management by Internet Companies
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62381/P243504
Author(s)
Yijun Huang, Qiteng Chen, Lie Luo, Zhongyan Lin*
Affiliation(s)
International Digital Economy College, Minjiang University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
*Corresponding Author.
Abstract
The ongoing evolution of the Internet economy has led to the emergence of algorithmic management as a key strategy for enhancing business efficiency among Internet companies. However, this approach has also given rise to concerns about potential algorithmic discrimination. In practice, the opacity of algorithms, the absence of legislative and administrative oversight, the internal management of enterprises, and other factors contribute to the emergence of algorithmic discrimination. At present, research on this ethical and legal issue is largely confined to the regulation of macroeconomic and market levels, as well as the general protection of users from the perspective of consumer rights and interests. There are few direct specifications for the problem of algorithmic discrimination. Following a comprehensive examination of the relevant research methods, including normative analysis, case analysis, comparative analysis, and others, this study investigates the existence of algorithmic discrimination and unfair competitive practices employed by Internet companies from the perspectives of both consumers and Internet companies. The aim is to provide insights that can inform the advancement of algorithmic management practices in a manner that is beneficial to all stakeholders.
Keywords
Algorithmic Discrimination; Unfair Competition; Internet Companies; Legal Regulation
References
[1] Barocas S, Hardt M, Narayanan A. Fairness and machine learning: Limitations and opportunities. MIT press, 2023.
[2] Calo R. Artificial intelligence policy: a primer and roadmap. UCDL Rev., 2017, 51: 399.
[3] Donovan J, Caplan R, Matthews J, et al. Algorithmic accountability: a primer. Data & Society Research Institute, 2018.
[4] Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen. Born free and equal?: a philosophical inquiry into the nature of discrimination. Oxford University Press, 2014.
[5] Harris, P. and Keller, K. Ex-offenders need not apply: The criminal background check in hiring decisions. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 21, 1 (2005), 6-30.
[6] Binns R. Fairness in machine learning: Lessons from political philosophy// Conference on fairness, accountability and transparency. PMLR, 2018: 149-159.
[7] Pasquale F. The black box society: The secret algorithms that control money and information. Harvard University Press, 2015.
[8] Tolga Bolukbasi, Kai-Wei Chang, James Y Zou, Venkatesh Saligrama, and Adam T Kalai. Man is to computer programmer as woman is to homemaker? debiasing word embeddings. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 4349–4357, 2016.
[9] See Juan Carlos Crisanto, Johannes Ehrentraud, Aidan Lawson and Fernando Restoy. "Big tech regulation: what is going on?" FSI Insights on policy implementation .2021.
[10] Sweeney L. Discrimination in online ad delivery. Communications of the ACM, 2013, 56(5): 44-54.