AEPH
Home > Philosophy and Social Science > Vol. 1 No. 6 (PSS 2024) >
Neither Being nor Non-being: On the Heidegger’s Concealed State of Beings
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62381/P243608
Author(s)
Hongcheng Wang
Affiliation(s)
School of Philosophy and Social Development, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
Abstract
Heidegger’s exploration of “concealed” and “disclosed” being in Being and Time and later works offers key insights into ontology. Through a critique of realism, Heidegger introduces the concept of “nature” to reveal a concealed mode of being that transcends Dasein’s understanding, while still avoiding the extremes of subjectivism and realism. This concealment neither fully depends on Dasein’s disclosure nor exists independently, challenging traditional subject-object dualisms. The research examines how Heidegger distinguishes between concealment and disclosure, offering a novel perspective on the interrelation between Being and Dasein. This study demonstrates how Heidegger’s ontology goes beyond subjectivism, contributing to a deeper understanding of the concealed dimensions of Being, and advancing a more comprehensive ontological framework that bridges both fundamental ontology and metontologie.
Keywords
Heidegger; Concealment; Nature; World
References
[1] Heidegger, M. Being and Time. Translated by Chen Jiaying et al., Commercial Press, 2018. p.266, p.260, p.232. [2] Blattner, W. “Heidegger’s Kantian idealism revisited” in Inquiry, 2004, 47(4): p.335. [3] David, R, Cerbone. “Realism and Truth” in A companion to Heidegger, Blackwell Publishing, 2005, p.251. [4] Heidegger, M. History of the concept of time: Prolegomena. Indiana University Press, 2009, pp.215-216, p.277. [5] Hoffman, P. “Heidegger and the Problem of Idealism” in Heidegger Reexamined, Volume 2 Truth, Realism, and the History of Being, Routledge, 2002, p.320. [6] Heidegger, M. Towards the Definition of Philosophy. Translated by Ted Sadler, Continuum, 2008. p.93. [7] Heidegger, M. The Basic Problems of Phenomenology. Translated by Ding Yun, Shanghai Translation Publishing House, 2008. p.224. [8] Dreyfus, H. Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger’s Being and Time, Division I. Translated by Zhu Songfeng, Zhejiang University Press, 2016. p.159, p.305. [9] Vallicella, W. Kant, Heidegger, and the Problem of the Thing-in-Itself. Translated by Fu Youde and Gai Xun, published in Foreign Social Sciences, no. 7, 1984. p.20. [10] David, R, Cerbone. “World, World-entry, and Realism in Early Heidegger” in Heidegger Reexamined, Volume 2 Truth, Realism, and the History of Being, 2002, p.297.
Copyright @ 2020-2035 Academic Education Publishing House All Rights Reserved