Search

Life Perspective and Well-being: A Cross-cultural Theoretical Exploration

Author(s)

Luyao Wang*

Affiliation(s)

Yan’an University, Yanan, Shaanxi, China *Corresponding Author

Abstract

This study investigates the relationship between life perspectives and well-being from a cross-cultural theoretical viewpoint, examining the complexity and diversity of this theme. Through literature review, theoretical analysis, and the integration of cross-cultural theories, the paper systematically reviews various cultural interpretations of life perspectives and their impact on well-being. The research primarily employs theoretical exploration combined with cross-cultural models, analyzing existing theories such as Hofstede's cultural dimensions, Leininger's cultural care model, and Guo's intercultural communication theory. By comparing definitions of life perspectives and well-being across different cultural contexts, cultural dimension differences, and their psychological impact, the study explores how cultural backgrounds shape individual life perspectives and influence subjective well-being. The paper focuses on the role of cultural differences in well-being composition, notably the influence of collectivism vs. individualism, power distance, and high uncertainty avoidance on individual well-being. Through theoretical integration, a cross-cultural model of life perspectives and well-being is proposed, elucidating the interactive relationship between cultural dimensions and well-being. Findings indicate significant differences in life perspectives across cultures, substantially affecting individual well-being experiences. Cross-cultural theory provides a crucial framework for understanding these differences, promoting harmonious intercultural communication and enhancing personal well-being. This study offers a theoretical foundation and new perspectives for future research and provides important guidance for improving intercultural communication and mental health.

Keywords

Life Perspective; Well-Being; Cross-Cultural Theory; Cultural Dimensions; Subjective Well-Being

References

[1] Ji Yuhua, Jiao Jingdong. Reflections on Three Issues of Intercultural Communication Theory [J]. Foreign Languages and Literature, 2007, 24(4):5. [2] Zhang Bei, Yang Yi. Research on Hofstede's Cultural Dimensions Theory and Intercultural Communication—Taking the Influence of Cultural Differences on Teacher-Student Communication in Foreign Teachers' Classrooms as an Example [J]. English Square: Academic Research, 2011(Z5):2. [3] Yu Qiuling. Academic Dialogue and Academic Life—After Reading "Intercultural Communication: Theory and Practice" [J]. Journal of Fujian Normal University: Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition, 2006. [4] He Ziwei. Research on Key Concepts of Yue Daiyun's Intercultural Theory [D]. Xinjiang University, 2020. [5] Zhu Lingling. Research on the Cultivation of Intercultural Communication Ability in College English Education under the "Belt and Road" Initiative [J]. College English Teaching and Research, 2018(6):4. [6] Chen Kai. Exploring English Teaching Models from the Perspective of Intercultural Communication Theory [J]. Journal of Fujian Commercial Higher Vocational School, 2008, 000(006):116-118. [7] He Shiqing, Huang Yina. Practice of Integrating Traditional Chinese Medicine Intervention Concept in Emergency Management Based on Leininger's Transcultural Theory [J]. Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine Management, 2023, 31(11):127-129. [8] Guo Min. Cross-Cultural Study on the Relationship between Subjective Well-being and Interpersonal Trust among College Students in Four Countries [D]. Inner Mongolia Normal University [2024-09-18]. [9] Zhang Qin, Guo Jiahui, Jia Zikang. Research on "The Analects" Cultural Teaching from the Perspective of Cross-Cultural Communication—Suggestions on Teaching Subjects and Objects [J]. Journal of Zhejiang University of Science and Technology, 2024, 36(2):127-134. [10] Tao Yue. Cultural Identity Study of the Documentary "From Chang'an to Rome" from the Perspective of Ritual Communication [D]. Yantai University, 2024. [11] Lan Yuxian. Arbitrariness and Iconicity of Chinese and English—Analysis Based on Complex Dynamic Systems Theory [J]. Modern Linguistics, 2024, 12(6):6. [12] Zhao Yuezhi, Gao Yuxi, Yu Yayun. From Participation Construction to Paradigm Transcendence: Re-understanding the Political Economy of Cross-Cultural Communication of "Hallyu" [J]. Young Journalist, 2024(6).