AEPH
Home > Philosophy and Social Science > Vol. 1 No. 7 (PSS 2024) >
Exploring the Consequence of Factors Influencing of Consumers on Tencent Conference Brand Satisfaction
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62381/P243707
Author(s)
Erjiang Wu
Affiliation(s)
Guangxi Academy of Oceanography, Nanning, Guangxi, China
Abstract
With the development of information technology, more and more people realize that the development of online conference software has a broad prospect by using information technology. With the continuous expansion of online conference user groups, the market scale of conferences will have greater development, Tencent Conference has a huge market development space. The questionnaire was distributed to consumers who have experienced using The Tencent conference in China and obtained valid data from 385 participants. Moreover, convenience sampling and snowball sampling are the sampling procedure. The research was quantitative research which applied Cronbach’s Alpha, Descriptive Analysis, and Multiple Linear Regression to analyze the factors influencing independent variables. The results of this research indicated that four independent variables which are rand experience, brand personality, brand image and advertisement had a significant influence on brand satisfaction. Moreover, some recommendations of this research were that Tencent Company should actively care about consumers' evaluation of brand personality, timely grasp the development direction of brand personality, and should increase advertising investment, increase advertising funds, which can establish h corporate brand, improve consumer brand satisfaction to promote the sustainable development of Tencent conference.
Keywords
Brand Satisfaction; Brand Experience; Brand Personality; Brand Image; Advertisement
References
[1] Amato, S., Esposito V.V. & Tenenhaus, M. (2004). A global goodness-of-fit index for PLS structural equation modelling. Journal of Business Research, 08(8), 12– 45. [2] Brakus, J.J., Schmitt, B.H., & Zhang, S. (2008). “Experiential Attributes and Consumer Judgments,” in Handbook on Brand and Experience Management, 18, 12-58. [3] Carroll, B., & Ahuvia, A. (2006). Some antecedents and outcomes of brand love. Marketing Letters, 17(2), 79–89. [4] Chattopadhyay, A & Laborie, J. (2005). Managing Brand Experience: The Market Contact Audit. Journal of Advertising Research, 45(1), 9-16 [5] Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 51–90. [6] He, H., Li, Y., & Harris, L. (2012). Social identity perspective on brand loyalty. Journal of Business Research, 65, 648–657 [7] Kim, H. (2005). Consumer profiles of apparel product involvement and values. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 9, 207-220. [8] Liljander, V., Polsa, P., & van Riel, A. (2019). Modelling consumer responses to an apparel store brand: Store image as a risk reducer. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 16(4): 281–290. [9] McAlexander, J.H., Schouten, J.W., & Koenig, H.F. (2002). Building brand community. The Journal of Marketing, 66(1), 38–54. [10] Ofir, C., & Simonson, I. (2007). The Effect of Stating Expectations on Customer Satisfaction and Shopping Experience. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(1), 164-174. [11] Park, C.W. & MacInnis, D.J. (2016). What’s in and What’s Out: Questions on the Boundaries of the Attitude Construct. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(1): 16-18. [12] Schau, J. H., Muniz, M. A., & Arnold, J. E. (2009). How brand community practices create value. Journal of Marketing, 73(5), 30–51.
Copyright @ 2020-2035 Academic Education Publishing House All Rights Reserved