Artistic Rural Construction Helps the Development of Rural Aesthetic Education in the Greater Bay Area
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62381/P243908
Author(s)
Yingli Yang1, Yuxuan Tan2,*
Affiliation(s)
1School of Fine Arts and Design, GuangDong University of Finance& Economics, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
2 School of Architecture, Art and Design, Guangzhou Academy of Fine Arts, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
*Corresponding Author.
Abstract
Currently, the development of rural aesthetic education in the Greater Bay Area is facing challenges such as lack of resources, single content, and backward concepts, while art rural construction, as an emerging rural development model, provides new ideas and methods for the development of rural aesthetic education. The study explores the influence mechanism of art rural construction on the development of rural aesthetic education in the Greater Bay Area, including resource integration, environmental optimisation, talent cultivation and conceptual updating. On this basis, the study proposes implementation strategies and paths for art to empower rural aesthetic education in the Greater Bay Area, which mainly include the excavation and utilisation of Lingnan culture and other local art resources, the construction of a diversified art education model, and the integration of art education and rural cultural construction. The implementation of these strategies not only enriches the content and form of rural aesthetic education, but also promotes the inheritance and innovation of rural culture in the Greater Bay Area, injecting cultural momentum into rural revitalisation. By assisting the development of rural aesthetic education through art rural construction, it is expected to cultivate more rural talents with artistic literacy and innovation ability, help the inheritance and innovation of rural culture, and ultimately achieve the comprehensive revitalisation and sustainable development of the villages in the Greater Bay Area.
Keywords
Art; Rural Aesthetic Education; Rural Revitalisation; Art Rural Construction; Intangible Cultural Heritage
References
[1] Xiong Yin, Zhang Fangping. Value Function and Realisation Strategy of Ecological and Aesthetic Education Curriculum in Compulsory Education Stage Rural School. Contemporary Education Forum, 2024, 10, pp.12.
[2] Mei Fen, Chen Mingbin. The inner mechanism and path of integrating aesthetic education into rural revitalisation--An essay on the ‘beauty of the countryside’ under the integration of tourism. Social Scientist, 2022, 06, pp. 45-52.
[3] Yan Ruoyuan; Yao Wenwei, On the Cultural Choice of Aesthetic Education in Rural Schools in the New Era, Chinese Educational Science (in Chinese and English). 2024.07(04), pp109-122
[4] Xiao Yi, Aesthetic Education Nurturing of New Rural Art and Culture Inheritance Vitality, Literature and Art Forum, 2021.10.01.
[5] Wang Mengtu. The Focus of Art Involvement in Rural Construction in the New Era. Art Management, 2022, 03, pp.110-115
[6] Zhou Teng. Development and Utilisation of Aesthetic Education Resources for Rural Children Based on Digital Art. Shanghai Costume, 2024,05, pp.75-77
[7] Deng Xiaojuan Wang Fuping, The inner mechanism and practice direction of “Internet+” empowering the change of aesthetic education teaching in rural schools, Research on Electrification Education . 2023 ,44 (03), pp71-77
[8] Wei Caihua; Sun Yujie, Research on the Optimization Path of Rural Revitalization Empowered by Culture and Art Industry, Economic Issues, 2024-08-29, pp103-110
[9] Cui Xuerong, Li Wen, Chen Jiayi, Cross-border linkage of rural aesthetic education teacher learning community construction, Journal of Aesthetic Education. 2024 ,15 (05), pp6-13
[10] Wang Pengfei, Li Zhen, Art Township Building and Cultural Reinvention in the Digital Age. Fine Arts. 2024 (03), pp18-25