Alienation in the Digital Age: Philosophical Reflections and Exploration
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62381/P243911
Author(s)
Long Ma
Affiliation(s)
Yan'an University, Yan'an, Shaanxi, China
Abstract
The rapid development and proliferation of technology in the digital age have induced profound social, economic, and cultural transformations. This paper aims to examine the manifestations and impacts of alienation in the digital era through a philosophical framework. Utilizing theoretical analysis, the study delves into the diverse forms of modern alienation by considering the rise of digital capitalism and the effects of technology on labor, products, and social relations. Initially, the paper reviews the classic concept of alienation and applies it to analyze labor, product, and social relation alienation in the current digital context. Through a systematic review of relevant literature and philosophical reflection, the paper highlights that, alongside convenience and efficiency, digital technology exacerbates individual alienation, particularly in virtual product consumption and digital social networks. The conclusion emphasizes the necessity of addressing this alienation through education and technological ethics to achieve autonomy and agency in the digital context. The paper advocates for critical thinking about digital technology to foster more humane development and societal transformation.
Keywords
Digital Age; Alienation; Philosophical Reflection; Digital Capitalism
References
[1] Li, Y. (2011). Aesthetic Paradox of Computer Music in the Digital Age. Journal of Northwest University: Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition, 41(3), 5.
[2] Zhou, W. (2024). Research on Connectivism Learning Theory in the Digital Age [Doctoral dissertation, East China Normal University]. DOI: CNKI:CDMD:2.1014.318173.
[3] Deng, X. (2022). Research on Core Categories of Chinese Literary Theory from the Perspective of Digital Humanities. Journal of Northwest Minzu University: Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition, (5), 182-188.
[4] Bai, L. (2020). Rules of Communication in a Multidimensional Network Space: A Multi-Dimensional Interpretation from the Perspective of Deleuze's Spatial Philosophy. Future Communication, 27(2), 7. DOI: CNKI:SUN:CMXB.0.2020-02-006.
[5] Yan, C. (2017). Field or Object: The Ontological Debate in the Post-Digital Era. 2017 National Architectural Digital Technology Teaching Seminar and DADA2017 Digital Architecture International Academic Seminar.
[6] Wang, T. (2004). Description and Construction: Two Reflections on the Philosophical Direction in the Digital Age. Jiangxi Social Sciences, (1), 6. DOI: CNKI:SUN:JXSH.0.2004-01-001.
[7] Liu, Z., & Chen, X. (2024). The Paradigm Shift Induced by AI4S: Issues, Methods, and Processes in Educational Research from the Perspective of Large Language Models. Distance Education Journal, 42(5), 23-34.
[8] He, Y. (2024). Research on Byung-Chul Han's Critique of Digital Capitalist Culture [Doctoral dissertation, Jilin University].
[9] Yu, C. (2024). New Paradigm of Legal AI: Dual Compatibility of Closure and Openness. Chinese and Foreign Law, (3). DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-4875.2024.03.002.
[10] Xu, Q. (2024). Loss of Human "Ge": The Simulated Existence of Personas and Its Reflection. Nanjing Social Sciences, (6), 18-26.